Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 10:13:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Quem escreveu a outra nota, fez juízo de valor sobre a autora do post, sem nenhuma prova documental comprobatória. Dessa forma, incorre no risco de ser processado na esfera penal e cível, com pagamento de indenização por dano moral. https://www.conjur.com.br/2008-fev-11/acusacao_provas_direito_indenizacao/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798187644255424805
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717582425897
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17981876442554248054E325E312EB966761BFDF34E830499DCE7654329BD72B9FB1B3FCAF6DBE5F72A