Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 23:04:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0F3A97005B9DC6E1A4F745CB355805AA2E985534B889E8E6AF4CAA5E13EA56A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a false interpretation of the study. The study is not evidence the SARS-CoV-2 virus was artificially created in North Carolina. This study is from 2016 and is on the SARS (2003) virus. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS (2003) are not the same virus https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26976607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329048/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798127583990607919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0F3A97005B9DC6E1A4F745CB355805AA2E985534B889E8E6AF4CAA5E13EA56A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717542241270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1798127583990607919E0F3A97005B9DC6E1A4F745CB355805AA2E985534B889E8E6AF4CAA5E13EA56A