Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 02:00:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 056A9E93A3F253206B6E2A5B39240F50F3E012A90F3A4367A214DB8A99D15F70
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a false interpretation of the study. The study is not evidence the SARS-CoV-2 virus was artificially created in North Carolina. This study is from 2016 and is on the SARS (2003) virus. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS (2003) are not the same virus https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26976607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329048/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798127583990607919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 056A9E93A3F253206B6E2A5B39240F50F3E012A90F3A4367A214DB8A99D15F70
  • createdAtMillis - 1717552819448
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1798127583990607919056A9E93A3F253206B6E2A5B39240F50F3E012A90F3A4367A214DB8A99D15F70