Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 11:22:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 12AC8E18952537E313B31AD4E7D5A87072F9AE05C0AB91D3A05CC9ABB385A4F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

For context, the choice in the study of what the news should have focussed and what # of hours would be reasonable for such a significant case is likely driven by bias. MRC has a conservative bias with mixed credibility. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/media-research-center-mrc/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798104070386811107
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 12AC8E18952537E313B31AD4E7D5A87072F9AE05C0AB91D3A05CC9ABB385A4F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1717586562288
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179810407038681110712AC8E18952537E313B31AD4E7D5A87072F9AE05C0AB91D3A05CC9ABB385A4F2