Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 15:56:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59D0DBE0EC423CECD9F4549A84F82EACF4CF13BC1D1186FCECFBCB1D9F8AEC01
Participant Details

Original Note:

Expressing criticism of scientific work and public representations of scientific views (including harsh criticism) isn’t “censoring.” Rasmussen criticizes Chan; Chan responds. That’s how this is supposed to work. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798020658514755772
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59D0DBE0EC423CECD9F4549A84F82EACF4CF13BC1D1186FCECFBCB1D9F8AEC01
  • createdAtMillis - 1717516568303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179802065851475577259D0DBE0EC423CECD9F4549A84F82EACF4CF13BC1D1186FCECFBCB1D9F8AEC01