Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 20:38:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBECE6B7B1E9F764C1F3EFC96664FAD0D1888797C8A8DB05958179094A4C66EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

While post does not cite any article/evidence and is likely speculation, proposed note is the same—the cited article is a year old and contains speculation of who might be indicted. Absent current evidence one way or another, there’s nothing to note here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797961460900823473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBECE6B7B1E9F764C1F3EFC96664FAD0D1888797C8A8DB05958179094A4C66EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1717533519261
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797961460900823473EBECE6B7B1E9F764C1F3EFC96664FAD0D1888797C8A8DB05958179094A4C66EC