Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 12:33:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCC08D99CDCA63F880B59232E5FAED79B25D393A378AEC3A55BBC6FE20A868EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While post does not cite any article/evidence and is likely speculation, proposed note is the same—the cited article is a year old and contains speculation of who might be indicted. Absent current evidence one way or another, there’s nothing to note here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797961460900823473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCC08D99CDCA63F880B59232E5FAED79B25D393A378AEC3A55BBC6FE20A868EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1717504433416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797961460900823473BCC08D99CDCA63F880B59232E5FAED79B25D393A378AEC3A55BBC6FE20A868EE