Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 09:52:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 037FDAF212BE0E9116661BA88498B198A6AAE515DDF6F4276BA0DCEC2ACA4EE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

見出しには市や業者の対応にずさんな点があることなどの重要な背景情報が欠けており、批判の理由などが一部で誤解されています。 このポストのリンク先ページでは、記事に対する専門家の補足説明があります。 https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6503207 https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASS5Q4GFHS5QTIPE019M.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797890715730821515
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 037FDAF212BE0E9116661BA88498B198A6AAE515DDF6F4276BA0DCEC2ACA4EE8
  • createdAtMillis - 1717494752369
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797890715730821515037FDAF212BE0E9116661BA88498B198A6AAE515DDF6F4276BA0DCEC2ACA4EE8