Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-03 21:48:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4F1FA23353BC1A382761091D5BFA4A96ED1E50E9624C28420E33D532C16BC65
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - This tweet is an opinion. The current proposed note linking to the article in the quote tweet is lazy and also missing the point of why this case is so controversial

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797744777666146646
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4F1FA23353BC1A382761091D5BFA4A96ED1E50E9624C28420E33D532C16BC65
  • createdAtMillis - 1717451287144
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797744777666146646C4F1FA23353BC1A382761091D5BFA4A96ED1E50E9624C28420E33D532C16BC65