Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-03 22:57:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2EB4A485A78DE655C01E62475BA33266F10A5F3C8F29B1F40A96BC5B5E0A91C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - This tweet is an opinion. The current proposed note linking to the article in the quote tweet is lazy and also missing the point of why this case is so controversial

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797744777666146646
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2EB4A485A78DE655C01E62475BA33266F10A5F3C8F29B1F40A96BC5B5E0A91C
  • createdAtMillis - 1717455433285
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797744777666146646C2EB4A485A78DE655C01E62475BA33266F10A5F3C8F29B1F40A96BC5B5E0A91C