Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 03:05:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1
Participant Details

Original Note:

A discussão da China ser comunista, socialista, capitalista ou ser uma nova organização econômica é algo contraverso na literatura. Por essa razão, acredito não ser necessário o uso de notas nessa publicação. "Não existe “socialismo puro” na China" Fonte: https://www.scielo.br/j/neco/a/FrQC4MWZ3W8hy5xLZkPQjmG/?format=pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797658802776383646
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1
  • createdAtMillis - 1717470305672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179765880277638364617A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1