Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 06:15:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DCC87088B9D12665E00B5FE2F249D68CD66DD3580EDEC129BCE9FA6364DA0CE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The Cass report is a discredited report excluding peer reviewed studies due to not being double blind, while knowing full well that a double blind study would be both deeply unethical and impossible due to the physical effects of HRT and puberty blockers. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/final-report-faqs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797547764886229085
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DCC87088B9D12665E00B5FE2F249D68CD66DD3580EDEC129BCE9FA6364DA0CE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1717481711549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797547764886229085DCC87088B9D12665E00B5FE2F249D68CD66DD3580EDEC129BCE9FA6364DA0CE5