Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 07:33:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD259E10D0D13EBA38A553C38A5F61F7D2527B48F3DECF085EFFFFCB21C462CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is factually wrong that its violation of international law for Phillipines to file a case in PCA unilaterally and it need conset from Chinese. https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2015/11/PCA-Arbitration-Rules-2012.pdf Furthur, after Phillipines filed the case, it was chinese who refuesed to fight the case https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2165478-phl-prc-china-note-verbale.html Moreover, China is member of PCA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_Court_of_Arbitration

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797509355736084718
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD259E10D0D13EBA38A553C38A5F61F7D2527B48F3DECF085EFFFFCB21C462CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1717486430362
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797509355736084718AD259E10D0D13EBA38A553C38A5F61F7D2527B48F3DECF085EFFFFCB21C462CC