Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-04 00:17:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Wikipedia editors have deemed the Daily Mail as “generally unreliable” and have discouraged its use as a source due to concerns over unreliability, sensationalism, and instances of plagiarism and copyright infringement https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website https://qz.com/907715/in-a-first-wikipedia-has-deemed-the-daily-mail-and-mail-online-too-unreliable-to-be-used-as-a-citation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797490042274971888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1717460238004
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797490042274971888F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB