Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-03 12:33:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 147CDB71736315D5140554412D1DBFDA5E5B85BEF3D4608FEF9882B8A4B795A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

元ニュースの見出しのとおり、不起訴を決めたのは東京地裁ではなく東京地検です。 https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/3fda97c8fb1d4189fcf5d8da245c6b37f96432ac 我が国で公訴権を有するのは(付審判請求や検察審査会の起訴強制議決の場合を除き)検察庁のみであり、その訴追判断には広い裁量があるとされています。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797481310447100061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 147CDB71736315D5140554412D1DBFDA5E5B85BEF3D4608FEF9882B8A4B795A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1717417998286
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797481310447100061147CDB71736315D5140554412D1DBFDA5E5B85BEF3D4608FEF9882B8A4B795A4