Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-03 09:40:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB83644315407FDEABFE00CFEAFAEC82B2920676FC5A41A950EE998AB46ED3C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

I can't imagine a post that better fits the description of, "Potentially misleading and would benefit from added context," and yet no note has been approved. Yes, it's an opinion but he also states what he believes are the facts he's basing that on, which are clearly false. https://www.democracydocket.com/analysis/the-u-s-court-system-explained/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797340767767171501
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB83644315407FDEABFE00CFEAFAEC82B2920676FC5A41A950EE998AB46ED3C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1717407602511
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797340767767171501BB83644315407FDEABFE00CFEAFAEC82B2920676FC5A41A950EE998AB46ED3C1