Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-03 00:17:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A704B9776DA94B06625177ECF78AE16F1909C4BA5E702FFCB1B599541D9EFE91
Participant Details

Original Note:

I can't imagine a post that better fits the description of, "Potentially misleading and would benefit from added context," and yet no note has been approved. Yes, it's an opinion but he also states what he believes are the facts he's basing that on, which are clearly false. https://www.democracydocket.com/analysis/the-u-s-court-system-explained/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797340767767171501
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A704B9776DA94B06625177ECF78AE16F1909C4BA5E702FFCB1B599541D9EFE91
  • createdAtMillis - 1717373820364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1797340767767171501A704B9776DA94B06625177ECF78AE16F1909C4BA5E702FFCB1B599541D9EFE91