Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 17:28:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9BCE08EF67F5C63FF08CAF26E59303927A83E0FAE7F8C1A7991C9FAEC28E813E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article misrepresents the areas of disagreement between For Women Scotland and the interviewee. The article reports the interviewee’s account of the issues as fact, but they are incorrect https://forwomen.scot/16/02/2024/appeal-to-the-uk-supreme-court/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797269453324882316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9BCE08EF67F5C63FF08CAF26E59303927A83E0FAE7F8C1A7991C9FAEC28E813E
  • createdAtMillis - 1717349327836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17972694533248823169BCE08EF67F5C63FF08CAF26E59303927A83E0FAE7F8C1A7991C9FAEC28E813E