Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 14:05:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Linking his Twitter page is not enough proof, as he could have deleted it by now. It's also clearly satire when looking at the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797267505745911907
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1717337158419
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17972675057459119077468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0