Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 11:23:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D6F6FAD6141A8CD7253090EFA5F500A8455477445F710B215ED5D9BE66E0F6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source cited by this tweet is a preprint and has not yet been peer-reviewed. It should not be taken as fact or used to guide clinical practice. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797223146409357578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D6F6FAD6141A8CD7253090EFA5F500A8455477445F710B215ED5D9BE66E0F6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1717327410883
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17972231464093575783D6F6FAD6141A8CD7253090EFA5F500A8455477445F710B215ED5D9BE66E0F6D