Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 09:32:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F28E5E2871624F15E533A2C06C46C3AC7796EF2A93A2D5A075BCAD1684A10A09
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study in question was published in 2018. This follows a trend over a number of years. As the OP has posted a screenshot of the article rather than link it, context needed. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797184255589601463
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F28E5E2871624F15E533A2C06C46C3AC7796EF2A93A2D5A075BCAD1684A10A09
  • createdAtMillis - 1717320737736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797184255589601463F28E5E2871624F15E533A2C06C46C3AC7796EF2A93A2D5A075BCAD1684A10A09