Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 17:02:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4F7635B74DD7D310D037C03728D1AAF76CCF78506D56A96EF117478E04806A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study in question was published in 2018. This follows a trend over a number of years. As the OP has posted a screenshot of the article rather than link it, context needed. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797184255589601463
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4F7635B74DD7D310D037C03728D1AAF76CCF78506D56A96EF117478E04806A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1717347751765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797184255589601463D4F7635B74DD7D310D037C03728D1AAF76CCF78506D56A96EF117478E04806A5