Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 09:52:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C7C4B69AA83A24833AAEC44B3EF5F2F71E1C5C2390AB3F5F953331FCE769393
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study in question was published in 2018. This follows a trend over a number of years. As the OP has posted a screenshot of the article rather than link it, context needed. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797184255589601463
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C7C4B69AA83A24833AAEC44B3EF5F2F71E1C5C2390AB3F5F953331FCE769393
  • createdAtMillis - 1717321962309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17971842555896014632C7C4B69AA83A24833AAEC44B3EF5F2F71E1C5C2390AB3F5F953331FCE769393