Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 08:02:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A227F644BDFE6CD20F73D7651485FD7496371F3E4867674434244F4DC3CBE767
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vivek is arguing that if the theory Trump violated FECA by not recording the payment as a campaign contribution is rejected, then there is no crime for him to intend to falsify records for. The falsification charges are then also moot because of statute of limitations. NNN. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Election_Campaign_Act#:~:text=The%20Federal%20Election%20Campaign%20Act,political%20campaign%20fundraising%20and%20spending.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797127709090312217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A227F644BDFE6CD20F73D7651485FD7496371F3E4867674434244F4DC3CBE767
  • createdAtMillis - 1717315323035
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797127709090312217A227F644BDFE6CD20F73D7651485FD7496371F3E4867674434244F4DC3CBE767