Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 14:00:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E83C1256145E46F4DC71581AFE27436CD7A5A7528D11F4840EBE347A8DFAF60
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vivek is arguing that if the theory Trump violated FECA by not recording the payment as a campaign contribution is rejected, then there is no crime for him to intend to falsify records for. The falsification charges are then also moot because of statute of limitations. NNN. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Election_Campaign_Act#:~:text=The%20Federal%20Election%20Campaign%20Act,political%20campaign%20fundraising%20and%20spending.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797127709090312217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E83C1256145E46F4DC71581AFE27436CD7A5A7528D11F4840EBE347A8DFAF60
  • createdAtMillis - 1717336823690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17971277090903122179E83C1256145E46F4DC71581AFE27436CD7A5A7528D11F4840EBE347A8DFAF60