Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 09:44:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F35B13528116AAA3CB40DA0E1AAC1302BCD60367804873BB2AC67FF28971372
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vivek is arguing that if the theory Trump violated FECA by not recording the payment as a campaign contribution is rejected, then there is no crime for him to intend to falsify records for. The falsification charges are then also moot because of statute of limitations. NNN. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Election_Campaign_Act#:~:text=The%20Federal%20Election%20Campaign%20Act,political%20campaign%20fundraising%20and%20spending.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797127709090312217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F35B13528116AAA3CB40DA0E1AAC1302BCD60367804873BB2AC67FF28971372
  • createdAtMillis - 1717321441487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17971277090903122176F35B13528116AAA3CB40DA0E1AAC1302BCD60367804873BB2AC67FF28971372