Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 23:46:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18ED0ED4329C1B9245B4C316DAD492A88B442FC71EE821FF592F2885D36E4008
Participant Details

Original Note:

Vivek is arguing that if the theory Trump violated FECA by not recording the payment as a campaign contribution is rejected, then there is no crime for him to intend to falsify records for. The falsification charges are then also moot because of statute of limitations. NNN. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Election_Campaign_Act#:~:text=The%20Federal%20Election%20Campaign%20Act,political%20campaign%20fundraising%20and%20spending.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797127709090312217
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18ED0ED4329C1B9245B4C316DAD492A88B442FC71EE821FF592F2885D36E4008
  • createdAtMillis - 1717371965413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179712770909031221718ED0ED4329C1B9245B4C316DAD492A88B442FC71EE821FF592F2885D36E4008