Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 02:46:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3F97C4A424BB60C94B3A8351958137F4D334D2BAEABD4A7A8B9A3350E8771D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no credible evidence or official documentation supporting the assertion that aspartame was ever on the Pentagon's list of biological warfare chemicals. Aspartame is approved for use and considered safe by major health organizations within specified limits. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/food-health/aspartame-bitter-sweet-controversy https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/aspartame-isnt-bad-says-chemistry https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/no-proven-health-risks-from-aspartame-but-also-no-proven-benefits/ https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/aspartame-and-other-sweeteners-food https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/chemicals/aspartame.html https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/corporate_publications/files/factsheetaspartame.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1797065523554857117
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E3F97C4A424BB60C94B3A8351958137F4D334D2BAEABD4A7A8B9A3350E8771D8
createdAtMillis - 1717296403849
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1797065523554857117E3F97C4A424BB60C94B3A8351958137F4D334D2BAEABD4A7A8B9A3350E8771D8