Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 21:03:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B65BEAC42E1AFDC0BB2DEC539F7F07453FDD484CE1F0BDA381F6688C5AF8693E
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Federal courts have repeatedly held that states can’t legally penalize defendants for pardoned federal crimes. In Boyd v. U.S. (1892), the Supreme Court held that a full unconditional presidential pardon restored a person’s competency to testify as a witness in state court.” https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-president-can-pardon-trump-biden-federal-state-court-constitution-law-stormy-daniels-election-2024-indictment-93d07def?reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797053900803219566
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B65BEAC42E1AFDC0BB2DEC539F7F07453FDD484CE1F0BDA381F6688C5AF8693E
  • createdAtMillis - 1717362204311
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797053900803219566B65BEAC42E1AFDC0BB2DEC539F7F07453FDD484CE1F0BDA381F6688C5AF8693E