Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 03:04:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22B8B72DD24F3C588F0008F1EC1C636729CDEA1772332D3A64B601A5166BECBD
Participant Details

Original Note:

“Federal courts have repeatedly held that states can’t legally penalize defendants for pardoned federal crimes. In Boyd v. U.S. (1892), the Supreme Court held that a full unconditional presidential pardon restored a person’s competency to testify as a witness in state court.” https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-president-can-pardon-trump-biden-federal-state-court-constitution-law-stormy-daniels-election-2024-indictment-93d07def?reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797053900803219566
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22B8B72DD24F3C588F0008F1EC1C636729CDEA1772332D3A64B601A5166BECBD
  • createdAtMillis - 1717297473729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179705390080321956622B8B72DD24F3C588F0008F1EC1C636729CDEA1772332D3A64B601A5166BECBD