Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 08:16:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9615BE46D7AC92B6BB60EF9568510CCC01F1A27A6E07F7611423B44E11DEE604
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CN is fine, It’s silly to assume that all 1.6 million viewers also checked the account to see if it was satirical or not, and even if so, it’s buried in the bio. It’s never bad to add additional context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797034515510038978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9615BE46D7AC92B6BB60EF9568510CCC01F1A27A6E07F7611423B44E11DEE604
  • createdAtMillis - 1717316203451
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17970345155100389789615BE46D7AC92B6BB60EF9568510CCC01F1A27A6E07F7611423B44E11DEE604