Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 02:01:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 126716F10FD08310A758A1643A933663B1977B85AAB6D34992A4AC40B0EA256E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CN is fine, It’s silly to assume that all 1.6 million viewers also checked the account to see if it was satirical or not, and even if so, it’s buried in the bio. It’s never bad to add additional context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1797034515510038978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 126716F10FD08310A758A1643A933663B1977B85AAB6D34992A4AC40B0EA256E
  • createdAtMillis - 1717293719422
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1797034515510038978126716F10FD08310A758A1643A933663B1977B85AAB6D34992A4AC40B0EA256E