Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-03 00:48:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58C0AE928A70DE9F2011D8F73298626C127B3277FF3847E40861BDFC60F164AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, ChatGPT no es una buena herramienta para esta clase de análisis y la información presentada es contradictoria y/o imposible. El experto en estadística Picanúmeros lo explica en su hilo: https://x.com/picanumeros/status/1796849085548314672?s=46&t=FO60ZPFxWqbQckBtgrhO-Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796852615378026860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58C0AE928A70DE9F2011D8F73298626C127B3277FF3847E40861BDFC60F164AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1717375690985
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179685261537802686058C0AE928A70DE9F2011D8F73298626C127B3277FF3847E40861BDFC60F164AC