Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 12:56:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C02FB139B793B9DC595A2F2F4EACC30A2B124CDE592B6C1630AD9F914AD4BBB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP incorrectly cites anti-abortion laws as the hospitals’ basis for refusing to treat his wife’s miscarriage. Texas law clearly exempts the removal of a dead, unborn child as abortion. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.245.htm Women in similar cases were told that the provider was liable for medical malpractice. https://www.liveaction.org/news/texas-abortion-plaintiffs-suing-doctors-ag/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796743055795773750
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C02FB139B793B9DC595A2F2F4EACC30A2B124CDE592B6C1630AD9F914AD4BBB0
  • createdAtMillis - 1717333012862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1796743055795773750C02FB139B793B9DC595A2F2F4EACC30A2B124CDE592B6C1630AD9F914AD4BBB0