Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-01 07:49:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05BB4EC551E9A09A33264EC1F1FB0545173BA91F91A2B96CFFB7757E273B5787
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article contains no emails showing Fauci bribed scientists. Not only is there no evidence for this, but the timing of the grant is inconsistent with such a claim. The meeting to review applications for the grant took place in November 2019, before SARS-CoV-2 pandemic https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-no-evidence-scientists-received-grant-for-changing-opinion-on-pandemic-origins-contrary-to-claims/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796732705733787862
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05BB4EC551E9A09A33264EC1F1FB0545173BA91F91A2B96CFFB7757E273B5787
  • createdAtMillis - 1717228157376
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179673270573378786205BB4EC551E9A09A33264EC1F1FB0545173BA91F91A2B96CFFB7757E273B5787