Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-01 23:25:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD361C4B6E4924C68FDC9DD2581EA07ADF4D349601E06A9A55682459992E1753
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence of political bias or motivation for the indictment (required members of a grand jury to bring forth) nor the conviction (which required the unanimous decision of 12 New Yorkers, some of whom voted for Trump in prior elections) https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/trumps-repeated-claims-on-his-new-york-hush-money-trial/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796600521513693651
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD361C4B6E4924C68FDC9DD2581EA07ADF4D349601E06A9A55682459992E1753
  • createdAtMillis - 1717284305942
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1796600521513693651DD361C4B6E4924C68FDC9DD2581EA07ADF4D349601E06A9A55682459992E1753