Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 18:11:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B9B14CF84DA8F41E3BE55730DDC7E7F31E7010A7DF7DA0759F80CCAAB077C0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence of political bias or motivation for the indictment (required members of a grand jury to bring forth) nor the conviction (which required the unanimous decision of 12 New Yorkers, some of whom voted for Trump in prior elections) https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/trumps-repeated-claims-on-his-new-york-hush-money-trial/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1796600521513693651
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 3B9B14CF84DA8F41E3BE55730DDC7E7F31E7010A7DF7DA0759F80CCAAB077C0E
createdAtMillis - 1717179096489
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17966005215136936513B9B14CF84DA8F41E3BE55730DDC7E7F31E7010A7DF7DA0759F80CCAAB077C0E