Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-02 16:54:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A82DF4611D6AB349BE7EA6BDD4FA52944ADEAB515DEF2F87CEEF5AC23C37811
Participant Details

Original Note:

kyle is using incorrect grammar. the correct statement would be should “have”, as opposed to should “of.” https://www.noredink.com/lessons/977#:~:text=Should%20have%20refers%20to%20past,it%20sounds%20like%20should've.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796600062249689128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A82DF4611D6AB349BE7EA6BDD4FA52944ADEAB515DEF2F87CEEF5AC23C37811
  • createdAtMillis - 1717347254992
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17966000622496891282A82DF4611D6AB349BE7EA6BDD4FA52944ADEAB515DEF2F87CEEF5AC23C37811