Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 17:41:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBA2A2298DCFE8EC6E1C7116505E5E2A857E27E9A0C79525ADCCA737DAB80877
Participant Details

Original Note:

La misma cuenta que supuestamente se cerró según el artículo citado de La Jornada es la misma arroba de la que viene este tweet, es decir que la cuenta no estaba cerrada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796590780947275960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBA2A2298DCFE8EC6E1C7116505E5E2A857E27E9A0C79525ADCCA737DAB80877
  • createdAtMillis - 1717177287334
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796590780947275960EBA2A2298DCFE8EC6E1C7116505E5E2A857E27E9A0C79525ADCCA737DAB80877