Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 17:44:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF6AF85789628B0AC88AE303969AB7A2BBBD0A6BF4F488E06D9879B73ABBFF56
Participant Details

Original Note:

La misma cuenta que supuestamente se cerró según el artículo citado de La Jornada es la misma arroba de la que viene este tweet, es decir que la cuenta no estaba cerrada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796590780947275960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF6AF85789628B0AC88AE303969AB7A2BBBD0A6BF4F488E06D9879B73ABBFF56
  • createdAtMillis - 1717177462749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796590780947275960DF6AF85789628B0AC88AE303969AB7A2BBBD0A6BF4F488E06D9879B73ABBFF56