Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 20:53:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 334F618880C40D3D0E551936540D4B3B62AEC6FED159519E1FA63F3BD347E2E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

La misma cuenta que supuestamente se cerró según el artículo citado de La Jornada es la misma arroba de la que viene este tweet, es decir que la cuenta no estaba cerrada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796590780947275960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 334F618880C40D3D0E551936540D4B3B62AEC6FED159519E1FA63F3BD347E2E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1717188815174
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796590780947275960334F618880C40D3D0E551936540D4B3B62AEC6FED159519E1FA63F3BD347E2E2