Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 17:52:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0683FE0DB2EE67C5D20488D67EC167A100D194363FCA4E0432E45FD21BE67D9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

La misma cuenta que supuestamente se cerró según el artículo citado de La Jornada es la misma arroba de la que viene este tweet, es decir que la cuenta no estaba cerrada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796590780947275960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0683FE0DB2EE67C5D20488D67EC167A100D194363FCA4E0432E45FD21BE67D9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717177970984
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17965907809472759600683FE0DB2EE67C5D20488D67EC167A100D194363FCA4E0432E45FD21BE67D9A