Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 14:24:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7365B5F8BE86CE35A91B8AC29E517C8E5B41C40866097E51387100C7E48FC49D
Participant Details

Original Note:

to call the legal process rigged & corrupt would go against his oath to hold up the constitution & rule of law. Furthermore DJT was indicted by a grand jury of his peers & convicted by another jury of his peers. There was no evidence of rigged or corrupt processes during trial https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/oath-of-office.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796544522165399745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7365B5F8BE86CE35A91B8AC29E517C8E5B41C40866097E51387100C7E48FC49D
  • createdAtMillis - 1717165493754
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17965445221653997457365B5F8BE86CE35A91B8AC29E517C8E5B41C40866097E51387100C7E48FC49D