Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 14:49:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62022CC97FCC7CC28497F7492435EC05A9A05FCE2BEF3FD40826799C76FE0FDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

La "exculpación" de Laporta viene a razón y de la mano de la decisión de la Audiencia de no imputar el delito de cohecho. La primera junta hubiese sido investigada en caso de mantenerse dicho delito, ya que no se consideraría prescrito (15 años). https://www.dexiaabogados.com/blog/prescripcion-delitos-economicos/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796538950426755531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62022CC97FCC7CC28497F7492435EC05A9A05FCE2BEF3FD40826799C76FE0FDA
  • createdAtMillis - 1717166970363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179653895042675553162022CC97FCC7CC28497F7492435EC05A9A05FCE2BEF3FD40826799C76FE0FDA