Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 14:14:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4D5C86FAD9204950CCDBDBE1869BF3CB008B29F306E54E1BB8974E0264267A35
Participant Details

Original Note:

La "exculpación" de Laporta viene a razón y de la mano de la decisión de la Audiencia de no imputar el delito de cohecho. La primera junta hubiese sido investigada en caso de mantenerse dicho delito, ya que no se consideraría prescrito (15 años). https://www.dexiaabogados.com/blog/prescripcion-delitos-economicos/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796538950426755531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4D5C86FAD9204950CCDBDBE1869BF3CB008B29F306E54E1BB8974E0264267A35
  • createdAtMillis - 1717164875326
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17965389504267555314D5C86FAD9204950CCDBDBE1869BF3CB008B29F306E54E1BB8974E0264267A35