Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 21:33:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49E5DC00C50D2D0A4E132FF37765D8F36813FD34C082679D52BAC096F21C17FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

La "exculpación" de Laporta viene a razón y de la mano de la decisión de la Audiencia de no imputar el delito de cohecho. La primera junta hubiese sido investigada en caso de mantenerse dicho delito, ya que no se consideraría prescrito (15 años). https://www.dexiaabogados.com/blog/prescripcion-delitos-economicos/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796538950426755531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49E5DC00C50D2D0A4E132FF37765D8F36813FD34C082679D52BAC096F21C17FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1717191234084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179653895042675553149E5DC00C50D2D0A4E132FF37765D8F36813FD34C082679D52BAC096F21C17FE