Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 14:36:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27937AE62FB101EFDA586CD225CF263C14739D24E48F24AECF358CB3305C556D
Participant Details

Original Note:

La "exculpación" de Laporta viene a razón y de la mano de la decisión de la Audiencia de no imputar el delito de cohecho. La primera junta hubiese sido investigada en caso de mantenerse dicho delito, ya que no se consideraría prescrito (15 años). https://www.dexiaabogados.com/blog/prescripcion-delitos-economicos/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796538950426755531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27937AE62FB101EFDA586CD225CF263C14739D24E48F24AECF358CB3305C556D
  • createdAtMillis - 1717166203140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179653895042675553127937AE62FB101EFDA586CD225CF263C14739D24E48F24AECF358CB3305C556D