Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 16:54:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FAA10848FDEA27CF245FBD8843445337908C73049B5F0D8EE24476330F4FD6AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

L' immunité présidentielle en matière civile n'a été reconnue par la Cour suprême que récemment (Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 751 (1982)). Cette immunité ne le protège pas contre des actes d'ordre purement privés (Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 693-94 (1997)). https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/le-president-des-etats-unis-dans-la-jurisprudence-de-la-cour-supreme https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/#:~:text=Jones%2C%20520%20U.S.%20681%20(1997)&text=The%20Sixth%20Amendment%20right%20to,executive%20immunity%20does%20not%20apply.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796532518650290394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FAA10848FDEA27CF245FBD8843445337908C73049B5F0D8EE24476330F4FD6AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1717174493153
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796532518650290394FAA10848FDEA27CF245FBD8843445337908C73049B5F0D8EE24476330F4FD6AA