Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 15:46:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C165876571489AA0FE6CA7270003FA1F82AC5783D5EC508BF53C78EBD2118E65
Participant Details

Original Note:

L' immunité présidentielle en matière civile n'a été reconnue par la Cour suprême que récemment (Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 751 (1982)). Cette immunité ne le protège pas contre des actes d'ordre purement privés (Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 693-94 (1997)). https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/le-president-des-etats-unis-dans-la-jurisprudence-de-la-cour-supreme https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/#:~:text=Jones%2C%20520%20U.S.%20681%20(1997)&text=The%20Sixth%20Amendment%20right%20to,executive%20immunity%20does%20not%20apply.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796532518650290394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C165876571489AA0FE6CA7270003FA1F82AC5783D5EC508BF53C78EBD2118E65
  • createdAtMillis - 1717170404954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1796532518650290394C165876571489AA0FE6CA7270003FA1F82AC5783D5EC508BF53C78EBD2118E65