Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-01 07:15:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68A17B41FB77A51CD962D4A99C8B007693896C2FC63BA6E666E966A6237E758B
Participant Details

Original Note:

L' immunité présidentielle en matière civile n'a été reconnue par la Cour suprême que récemment (Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 751 (1982)). Cette immunité ne le protège pas contre des actes d'ordre purement privés (Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 693-94 (1997)). https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/le-president-des-etats-unis-dans-la-jurisprudence-de-la-cour-supreme https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/#:~:text=Jones%2C%20520%20U.S.%20681%20(1997)&text=The%20Sixth%20Amendment%20right%20to,executive%20immunity%20does%20not%20apply.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796532518650290394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68A17B41FB77A51CD962D4A99C8B007693896C2FC63BA6E666E966A6237E758B
  • createdAtMillis - 1717226117581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179653251865029039468A17B41FB77A51CD962D4A99C8B007693896C2FC63BA6E666E966A6237E758B